A selection of ACHEEV's methodological work
- Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries
- Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research
- Methodological challenges in deliberative empirical ethics
- Developing and applying a deductive coding framework to assess the goals of Citizen/Community Jury deliberations
- Citizens’ juries can bring public voices on overdiagnosis into policy making
- Grounded theory and empirical ethics
- Debating diversity: a commentary on Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research
- Valuing Healthcare Improvement: Implicit Norms, Explicit Normativity, and Human Agency
- CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries – Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996–2015
- Discussion: Attending to Values and Quality of Patient Involvement in HTA