Critical analysis

What is critical analysis? 

Have you ever received the following tutor feedback in relation to the assignments you submitted? 

      • “Lack of critical evaluation”
      • “Very little critical analysis in this assignment”
      • “Not enough analysis of the evidence is taking place in this assignment”
      • “Not enough points of view are taken into account”
      • “Your work is too descriptive”

In an academic context, critical thinking is necessary because not all the ideas and theories that you will come across in your research are valid or factual. You will be required to read and investigate many sources, compare and contrast the evidence, and judge the validity or merit of individual arguments in relation to other sources. 

This process will help you identify strengths and limitations in the academic arguments presented in the research you accessed. Commenting on these strengths, weaknesses, or limitations in the assignment you write will demonstrate that you are indeed able to think, and write, critically. This process is fundamental in formulating a thesis in relation to the topic you investigate. 

Please note: “Being critical” does not necessarily mean that you need to identify issues or problems in the research you accessed.  

Being critical involves making judgements or evaluations, challenging assumptions, and/or pointing at the limitations of the research articles you have read. At university, these judgements and evaluations are usually based on evidence gained from reading widely. 

Your critical response to research, or an argument in an article, for example, needs to be informed criticism. It needs to be well grounded in research, to demonstrate wide reading, and to consider other evidence. Criticisms in this sense are based on a synthesis of a number of factors, and are not just personal opinion. 

When you are engaged in the process of thinking critically about issues, you should be guided by at least the following criteria:  

      • Never accept a statement as true merely because someone has said it is true.
      • Never condemn a statement as false unless (a) you can produce rational evidence to support your position and (b) you have a sound reason for attempting to demonstrate its falsity.
      • Always ask questions of the things you are exploring. For example: “What if? Why? Why not? Who has written this? Is there other research coming to different conclusions?” 

Critical thinking and critical analysis are integral to academic disciplines and to academia generally because this is the main way that knowledge is added to a field. While academics in a particular field may agree with the conclusions of a particular piece of research, these conclusions may open up other questions which need to be answered. 

Only through constantly questioning – “What if? How could? What does this mean for … ?” - is new knowledge added to a field. In this way, academic disciplines constantly evolve. 

Describing and summarising the information you found in the research is an important first step. It is necessary, but it is not enough. For most assessment tasks, you will need to analyse and interpret the information in relation to the assignment question. You will need to provide critical commentary on the expert evidence you choose to present, or comment on the significance of the examples you provide. 

Critical analysisis a process of deconstructing what you read, write or listen to in a rational and logical manner (Brown & Keely 2012).  

However, while you are encouraged to critique, your response always has to be informed and well-grounded in research and wide reading. Critical analysis moves beyond simple description of a particular topic into the realms of analysis and evaluation, as visualised in the diagram below: 

A person walking up stairs with an arrow pointing upward with the following text: Evaluation- So what? What if? What next?  Analysis- How? Why?  Description- Who? What? Where? When?

Critical analysis is associated with a "deep approach" to your learning, which means that you relate new knowledge to what you already know. It also requires the examination of theoretical concepts and ideas; comparing and contrasting issues and perspectives to challenge your own understandings and to speculate and seek out implications. Furthermore, you must be able to distinguish between what is evidence and what is an argument. This involves questioning assumptions, recognising generalisations, and identifying bias in what you see, read and hear. Thinking critically helps you to uncover links across large and diverse bodies of knowledge enabling you to synthesise your own informed ideas. 

At university, it is essential to think critically as it allows you to understand and analyse the evidence, ideas and claims within your particular field of study. Critical analysis allows you to have greater clarity on the issues and information you process. Academic disciplines are kept alive through constant reflection, debate and refinement of ideas. Critical analysis is thus crucial to the survival and renewal of all fields of enquiry. 

In an academic context, critical analysis requires you to do the following in all your endeavours: 

  • Provide informed reasoning supported by evidence and ideas from trustworthy academic resources such as books and peer-reviewed journal articles.
  • Identify context, background and/or bias that may lead to distortion within what you read and hear.
  • Identify and question unfounded assumptions.
  • Explain the significance, implications and consequences of particular data, arguments and conclusions made by others (Drew & Bingham 2001, pp. 281 - 282) 
  • What do I already know?
  • What do I need to work out?
  • Is this fact or opinion?
  • What evidence do they use to back their claim?
  • What are the stated and unstated assumptions in this information?
  • Are there other ways we can think about this?
  • Is it convincing and relevant? 

To critically evaluate research, you can interrogate the source on its content, authorship, currency and quality of the research. 

Questions you can ask in relation to the content: 

    • What is the research question? What are the aims of the work? 
    • What were the main findings? Were the aims achieved?
    • Have the findings been honestly / reliably reported? 
    • Is there evidence of bias? 
    • Are there subjective views expressed in the academic paper?
    • What methodology and type of evidence were used for this research? 
    • Was this a suitable methodology for the questions the authors seek to answer?
    • Has the evidence been interpreted fairly?
    • How many participants were there? What sampling method was used?
    • Are the discussion and conclusion soundly based on findings, or do they go too far (issue of overgeneralisation)?
    • Does the writer present a balanced picture of the issue?
    • Do the authors present other ways of thinking, other “schools of thought”.
    • Or is the research a bit one-sided?
    • Are contrary viewpoints considered?
    • How do these findings relate to other research or studies in the field? 

Questions you can ask in relation to authorship: 

    • Who wrote this text, when and why: question the authority of the text.
    • You may want to check the credentials of the authors, their research output.
    • Who / what is left out of the text? Why?
    • Does the work significantly enhance the reader’s understanding of key ideas or theories?
    • Does it constitute a significant contribution in the field? 

Questions you can ask in relation to currency and quality of the research: 

    • Are the points made by the author supported by quality, recent evidence?
    • Is the evidence anecdotal or is the evidence the result of scientific study / research?
    • Is the evidence properly referenced?
    • Is a wide range of evidence presented?
    • Is it recent? 

Here are a few useful phrases that can introduce your critical reflections: 

  • This is significant because…
  • This demonstrates…
  • This shows…
  • It is important to consider… in the context of…
  • It is important to consider… in light of…
  • This research indicates that…
  • These figures suggest that…
  • Another study indicates that…
  • [ Author 1 ] argues…, on the other hand, [ Author 2 ] claims that…
  • [ Author 1 ] argues…, yet / however / nonetheless / nevertheless [ Author 2 ] claims that…
  • While [ Author 1 ] states that …, [ Author 2 ] contends that… 

Additional resources 

 

References 

Browne, M & Keeley, S 2012, Asking the right questions: a guide to critical thinking, 10th edn, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 
Drew, S & Bingham, R 2001, The Student Skills Guide, 2nd edn, Gower, Aldershot, UK.