Referencing & citing

Referencing and citing links your reading to your writing and allows you to strengthen your arguments, add credibility by referring to the ideas and work of others and, importantly, minimise the chance of plagiarism by acknowledging the sources used.

Referencing and citing is an important aspect of academic writing and there are many questions you may have about it, including why we do this and how to go about it.

Different referencing styles are used across UOW depending on the field of study. It is essential to check in each Subject Outline and/or check with your subject coordinator or tutor about which is the correct style to use.

Referencing guides for some common styles used at UOW

More referencing styles hosted by other universities

In academic writing, you need to use evidence to support your argument and the information you present, and there are various ways to integrate evidence into your writing.

Key points

  • Paraphrasing: A critical academic practice of using your own words to talk about the work and ideas of others without changing the meaning. Learn more about paraphrasing
  • Quoting: Using the exact words from another work and presenting them in an appropriate format in your text. Learn more about quoting.
  • Summarising: A great habit to get into where you extract from a text the most relevant information for your needs. You probably already do this in your daily life. Learn more about summarising

When undertaking research for assessments you must decide whether a source is reliable or not, particularly if you have found it online. For instance, a peer-reviewed journal article is likely more trustworthy than a blog.

Before using generative AI when preparing your assignments, it is important to check your assessment instructions or with your Subject Coordinator to ensure this is permitted.

If you have permission to use generative AI in your assessment work, your use of generative AI needs to be acknowledged.

Academic integrity is the principle that academic work is produced honestly. This means acknowledging all sources of information in your assignment, including generative AI. It also means paraphrasing and summarising sources of information in your assignment, including generative AI.

Failure to take these important steps can mean your use of generative AI violates the UOW academic integrity policy and becomes academic misconduct. Notable types of resulting misconduct could include plagiarism, cheating, and ghost writing.

Different ways of acknowledging your use of generative AI:

Using generative AI as a writing or assistive tool – You must provide a statement addressing your use of generative AI in the assignment’s creation. This statement must specifically illustrate how you have used generative AI in your assessment. Follow any guidelines provided by your Subject Coordinator, e.g. if they are seeking specific information about your use of AI or if the assignment stipulated creating and/or evaluating generative AI content; if none are provided, the statement below can be adapted:

Example: The generative AI tool [Name] was accessed on [Date] to assist in the writing/editing/formulation of the [Subject Code] assessment task [Task Name]. [Name] was used to [List functions of AI in assignment creation].

Using generative AI as a research tool for coursework assessments – In addition to the above acknowledgment, if you are permitted to use generative AI as a research tool and draw upon this information in your assessment task, you will need to reference the original generative AI source. An in-text citation must be included at the point where you quote, paraphrase, summarise, or synthesise information from this source, with an accompanying reference list/bibliography entry added for this source.

Please note:

    • As generative AI is widely considered an unreliable source, you are encouraged to prioritise searching for quality peer-reviewed academic literature.
    • Not all referencing styles have guidelines for citing generative AI in their reference lists/bibliographies. Please see the guidelines below.
    • For citations that include prompts, for lengthy prompts include an excerpt in the citation, e.g. “Describe the features of the Revisionist Western …” and provide the full prompt in an Appendix.

 

Examples for citing generative AI across different referencing styles used at UOW

Further information can be found in UOW’s Referencing Guide.

AGLC4
  • Footnote: Output from ChatGPT, Open AI to Jodie Eccleston, 14 June 2024.
  • Bibliography: OpenAI, ChatGPT to Jodie Eccleston, Output, 14 June 2024.

Further information on AGLC4 

Harvard
  • In-text citation: (GenAI Company date)
    • Example: (OpenAI 2023)
  • Reference list: Company. Year, Product name [type of AI model], Retrieved day month Year, <URL>.

Further information on Harvard

Footnoting

N.B. The below is a suggestion only, as the Australian Government Style Manual Documentary-note system does not provide specific guidance for referencing generative AI.

  • Footnote: OpenAI, ChatGPT output in response to [prompt], https://chatgpt.com, 14 June 2024.

Further information on Footnoting

IEEE

N.B.  IEEE does not provide specific guidance for referencing generative AI. Consult your Subject Coordinator regarding suitable AI referencing.

Further information on IEEE

MLA

N.B. MLA does not recognise the GenAI as the author. Instead, the ‘Title of the Source’ describes what was generated by the AI tool.

  • In-text citation: (“title of source”). Describe, in short-hand, the GenAI prompt used.
    • Example: (“Describe the symbolism”)
  • Reference List: "Title of source” prompt. Name of AI tool, version of AI tool, Company, Date content was generated, general web address of tool.
    • Example: “Describe the symbolism of the green light in the book The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald” prompt. ChatGPT, 13 Feb. version, OpenAI, 8 Mar. 2023, chat.openai.com/chat.

Further information on MLA

Chicago

Notes and Bibliography (Footnote) Style

  • In-Text Citation: According to OpenAI,1 ChatGPT states that the University of Wollongong was founded in...
    Footnote: 1. Text generated by ChatGPT, June 14, 2024, OpenAI, https://chat.openai.com/chat
  • Footnote: 1. Text generated by ChatGPT, June 14, 2024, OpenAI, https://chat.openai.com/chat 
    N.B. The AI content prompt can be included in the footnote if not mentioned in text, for example: Footnote: 1. ChatGPT, response to “Explain the history of the University of Wollongong, Australia,” June 14, 2024, OpenAI.
  • Bibliography: Generative AI is not normally cited in a Chicago Style bibliography.

Author-Date Style

  • In-Text Citation: The University of Wollongong was officially founded in 1951 (ChatGPT, June 14, 2024).
    According to OpenAI (2024), ChatGPT describes the University of Wollongong as...
  • Reference List: Generative AI is not normally cited in a Chicago Style bibliography.

Further information on Chicago

Vancouver

Reference list: ChatGPT. Response to input (March 14 version) [Large language model]. OpenAI; 2024 June 14. Available from: URL.

Further information on Vancouver

APA7

In-Text Citations

  • Author prominent / narrative in-text citation: OpenAI (2024)
    • Example: In response to the prompt, “Explain the similarities between Piaget and Vygotsky’s theories of learning,” OpenAI (2024) identified that both theorists...
  • Parenthetical in-text citation: (OpenAI, 2024)
    • Example: Piaget and Vygotsky’s educational theories focus on... (OpenAI, 2024).
  • Reference list: OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Jun 19 version) [Large language model].
    https://chat.openai.com/chat

Further information on APA7

 

 

 

 

There are several tools that can assist you with referencing:

  • Endnote: This tool is supported by UOW and can be used by postgraduate students to help manage information sources when writing. Learn more about EndNote
  • Other referencing tools: Tools recommended for undergraduate students include Zotero and Mendeley. Find out more